RECENT LITIGATION VICTORIES FOR STONE & JOHNSON CLIENTS

Claimant is Contractor not Employee in Workers' Comp Win
Stone & Johnson partner Patrick Duffy successfully argued before the Illinois Workers Compensation Commission that an employer-employee relationship did not exist between the claimant and Dynamex. The claimant, a delivery driver, had sustained a left shoulder injury while making a delivery and sought workers' compensation benefits pursuant to the Illinois Workers Compensation Act. Mr. Duffy argued, on behalf of Dynamex, that the claimant was not an employee of Dynamex, but rather an independent contractor and therefore not entitled to benefits under the IWCA.

Coverage Win in Construction Litigation
William Stone and Steve Pietrick recently succeeded in obtaining summary judgment from a Cook County Chancery Court judge in a major declaratory judgment action involving underlying construction litigation. Not only did the court find that the defendant insurer owed a duty to defend the firm's construction company client and to reimburse the defense costs already paid by another insurance company, but also ruled that the defendant violated Section 155 of the Insurance Code and therefore owed attorneys fees and penalties. Additional rulings sought and obtained by the firm for tactical reasons have positioned the clients well for any possible appeals.

Coverage Attorney Prevails in Declaratory Judgment Action on Advertising Injury Claim
Christian Ambler successfully obtained summary judgment for an insurer in a declaratory judgment action regarding an underlying claim seeking over $8 million. The underlying claim alleged that the insured misappropriated intellectual property and misused marketing material belonging to the claimant. The insured tendered the claim to its carrier under the advertising injury coverage of its general liability policy. Christian filed a declaratory judgment action on behalf of the insurer, and ultimately prevailed on cross-motions for summary judgment. The court awarded summary judgment to the insurer, finding that coverage was precluded under the Knowing Violation and Knowledge of Falsity exclusions to the advertising injury coverage. This decision was successfully protected and affirmed upon further challenge by the insured.

Verdict in a Serious Arm-Off Case Against Prominent Illinois Plaintiff’s Counsel
William Stone, Charles William Cross, Steve Pietrick and Jennifer M. Kanady of Stone & Johnson recently concluded a three week trial before the Honorable Judge Duncan-Brice in an arm-off case where the plaintiffs asked the jury for $16.8 million and received a verdict for $2.6 million which was $400,000.00 less than the $3 million offered prior to trial. Although it was the first jury verdict lost by lead counsel, William Stone, given the verdict was $400,000.00 less than the offer, the firm’s client, St. Paul Insurance Company, considered the verdict a major win.

Appellate Victory in Matter of First Impression
Stone & Johnson partner Patrick Duffy obtained a significant appellate victory in the case of Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, as subrogee of Caliber Auto Transport v. Jose Carrizalez, 375 Ill.App.3d 537. Chubb Group had filed a subrogation action to recover workers' compensation benefits it paid as a result of a vehicle accident. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on a release signed by the injured employee. The First District Appellate Court held, as a matter of first impression, that a release signed by an injured employee in settlement of a personal injury case is not valid to release the subrogation claim of the employer workers' compensation insurer.

$4,000,000 Jury Verdict against Malpracticing Attorney
William Stone, Richard Johnson, and associate Andrea Ross recently concluded a three-week trial before Judge Suriano in the Cook County Law Division. Stone & Johnson represented the plaintiff, a Civil Engineer from China, in a legal malpractice case against an immigration attorney. The defendant immigration attorney failed to obtain a bond on behalf of his client and plaintiff was then incarcerated for 25 months. Jurors deliberated for only 4 hours before returning a verdict on behalf of the plaintiff in the amount of $4,000,000. In post-verdict interviews, the jurors indicated that they decided liability against the defendant almost immediately, and that Mr. Stone's closing argument, describing the horrific effects of 25 months in prison, persuaded them to award the plaintiff with a significant verdict. More Info...

Directed Verdict for Defendant Bank in Defamation Case
Rick Valek obtained a Directed Verdict on behalf of his client, Chase Bank, in a jury trial before Judge Zwick in the Law Division of Cook County. Shortly after a Chase Bank branch was robbed, several bank employees pointed out that the plaintiff was acting suspiciously; he was then arrested by the Chicago police but later released. Plaintiff then sued Chase Bank and the City of Chicago, alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, defamation and negligence. At trial, Rick argued that Chase employees were justified in cooperating with police and pointing out an individual acting suspiciously after an armed robbery. Judge Zwick granted Rick's Motion for a Directed Verdict in favor of Chase. The jury later found the City of Chicago was Not Guilty.

Summary Judgment Granted in Slip and Fall
Rick Valek recently prevailed on a Motion for Summary Judgment in a Cook County premises liability case. The plaintiff tripped and fell, allegedly on a plastic beverage container lid, while entering a restaurant. Plaintiff's medical specials were approximately $150,000, and she claimed an additional $60,000 in lost wages. Rick filed a Motion for Summary Judgment arguing that the defendant's inspection and garbage removal procedures were reasonable, and that the defendant did not have notice of any debris on the day of the accident because of windy conditions in the area. The trial court granted summary judgment, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Motorcycle Riding School Prevails Against Injured Student
Matt Stephens won a Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of a motorcycle riding school. The plaintiff was taking a beginner's course in motorcycle riding. On the second day of the course, he fell over while riding on the practice course, resulting in fractures of his left tibia and fibula. Matt filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the Release and Waiver of Liability forms signed by the plaintiff. Judge Lawrence granted the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismissed plaintiff's case with prejudice. Plaintiff has not appealed the decision.