CHRISTIAN
D. AMBLER
Email:
cambler@stonejohnsonlaw.com
ADMISSIONS
Illinois Supreme Court
United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Pro hac vice admissions to practice in the courts of numerous states

RECENT
LITIGATION VICTORIES
Construction Defect Verdict in Case of Admitted Liability Less
than 10% Plaintiffs’ Final Demand
Christian Ambler recently tried a construction defect case in St. Joseph County,
Indiana. The plaintiffs’ house was constructed with the furnace and
the fireplace venting into the attic and the chimney chase, rather than outside
the house. Liability could not be disputed, and the case was tried on damages.
The plaintiffs, a family of four, lived in the house for four and a half years
before the defect was discovered, along with significant mold growth caused
by moisture condensation from the furnace flue. The plaintiffs claimed substantial
economic losses, as well as medical, psychological and wage loss damages resulting
from their alleged exposure to mold and carbon monoxide. The plaintiffs’
initial demand of $4.9 million was reduced before trial to $1.5 million after
the exclusion of one of their five expert witnesses. After a 7-day trial,
the jury awarded nothing to the mother or the two children, and $135,000 to
the father. The verdict represents a significant victory for the firm’s
client and its insurers, since liability and certain damages had to be admitted.
Summary
Judgment on all Counts in Fatal Products Liability Toxic Tort Case
Christian Ambler recently obtained summary judgment on all counts in a products
liability case in which the plaintiff’s husband allegedly died as a
result of exposure to benzene in petroleum products distributed by the firm’s
client. The plaintiff asserted claims of strict products liability and negligent
failure to warn. The court first found that the firm’s client had sufficiently
identified the manufacturers of the products it distributed, thereby entitling
it to summary judgment on the strict liability counts under Illinois’
“pass-through” statute. In a separate ruling, the court also found
that the firm’s client had no duty under which the plaintiff could recover
on the negligence count.